Cuil the Rival of Google

Former specialists of Google have announced, Sunday, launching a new search engine called Cuil, in an attempt to exceed in size the current leader in this field, but the team Cuil Inc. (pronounced “cool”), which can be accessed at http://www.cuil.com, provides new search services, and company representatives argue that can access faster than Google wider areas of the Internet, generating more references to a search.

Specialists who created the new program argue that it is not limited to classical methods aimed at the search address traffic and a Website, but examines the context of each page and concepts on which Internet users use them for their searches.

“Important discoveries we’ve made in search technology have allowed us to index a more extensively to inerne and put almost the entire Web to reach our users,” said the executive director of Cuil, Tom Costello.

Danny Sullivan, Web specialist and chief editor of Search Engine Land, is of the opinion that the engine Cuil Asia Pacific to exploit unhappiness that users have to Google that it aims to achieve too much, that the search results displayed in the first row Website popular and that rely too much on some Internet sites such as Wikipedia.

“It’s the right time for a competitor,” said Sullivan, “but to be rival Google is still a difficult task, something that those from Microsoft were convinced to.”

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to “Cuil the Rival of Google”

  1. yanjiaren says:

    I always think it is healthy for competition to exist otherwise technology would not go forward fast enough. It is good that other companies are rivalling Google, though the task might be uphill for other companies there is still scope for others to have a fair share of the pie.

  2. Julia says:

    I tried to use it, but I didn’t like it at all.
    I didn’t like the results style.. It is harder to find what you are looking for. I prefer the one column list (Google and others)..

    They say that they have more websites than Google does.. I don’t think so.. Maybe.. but I still prefer Google! :)

Leave a Reply